Summarize research into key points, conclusions and open questions while retaining sources.
Digests the papers, articles and reports you already have into structured briefs: the central thesis, evidence-backed findings, method, limitations, actionable takeaways and page-anchored quotes — each with a quick read on the source's credibility, evidence strength, recency and bias signals.
Beyond single files: two to five documents get individually distilled and then compared, with agreements, contradictions and complements laid out; citation lists can be extracted in consistent formatting. It works on supplied material only — when sources still need to be found on the web, that's the research skills' job.
Briefs follow fixed templates so every output has the same shape, and land in your workspace or Notes for later reference.
Examples describe the request and the shape of the expected deliverable; they are not completed run results.
Brief this paper in the academic structure: thesis, three findings each with evidence, sample and method, author-acknowledged limits, plus one action I can use next week.
A workspace brief; every finding carries its source location and a credibility note.
These two market-size estimates disagree. Compare their data sources, time windows and definitional scope, and say which layer the conflict sits in.
A dimension-aligned comparison with conflict attribution, keeping both figures as printed rather than averaging them.
iOS · Android
iOS
Android
MIT
MIT (root LICENSE)
The pinned skill subtree and shipped references were audited; full applicable license and per-file adaptation/asset notes are preserved under references/licenses/ and references/PROVENANCE.md.
Publication commit 25e07dbeeb, audited source 84c524b6fb; catalog digest iOS 46196ba57ed7… · Android 16de89d019e2….
Version records ship with the signed catalog; the target and released versions are shown below.
